Is a Scanned Image of a Prescription or Test Results Really a Digital Health Record?

A true digital health record is structured, searchable, interoperable, and actionable. By contrast, images or PDFs are passive data points that cannot easily be used for clinical decision-making, analytics, or system-wide efficiencies. As India pushes toward a digital health future, it’s crucial to understand the pitfalls of confusing scanned documents with actual electronic health records (EHRs).

Lack of Searchability and Context : A scanned prescription is essentially a picture. Doctors cannot quickly search for a drug history, lab trend, or allergy by typing a query. Patients end up scrolling through endless files to find the right record, and critical details may get overlooked.‍‍

No Interoperability : Digital health requires records to be shared across providers, labs, pharmacies, and insurers. A scanned image cannot be easily parsed by software systems. For example, if a lab result is stored as a PDF, another system cannot extract the blood sugar value automatically to build a trend chart.‍‍

Limited Clinical Use : Doctors often hesitate to rely on scanned images because handwriting may be illegible or details incomplete. A structured digital record ensures clarity, whereas a scanned document leaves too much room for error.

Duplication and Fragmentation : Patients who move between providers end up with a patchwork of images scattered across apps, hospital portals, and WhatsApp chats. Without structured data, consolidating or analyzing these records becomes nearly impossible.

What a True Digital Health Record Means

A genuine digital health record is not just a storage mechanism but a living, evolving dataset. It has a few defining characteristics:‍‍

Structured Data: Information is captured in standardized fields—drug names, dosages, test values, diagnoses—so it can be searched, analyzed, and acted upon.

Interoperability: The record can be shared across systems using common standards (like HL7 FHIR), ensuring continuity across providers, labs, and insurers.

Patient-Centric Access: Patients can access, update, and share their records through secure apps or portals.

Analytics and Insights: Data can be aggregated to provide trends, predictive alerts, and preventive care nudges.
‍
Integration with Ecosystem: From pharmacies to insurers, different stakeholders can use the same record to streamline services such as e-prescriptions, prior authorizations, or claim settlements.

Chronic Disease Management: For a diabetic patient, structured data allows blood sugar trends to be tracked over months, with alerts for dangerous patterns.

Emergency Care: In critical situations, doctors can access allergy lists, prior medications, and key medical history instantly.

Insurance Efficiency: With standardized data, claims can be processed quickly without manual paperwork.

Research and Public Health: Aggregated, anonymized records help policymakers identify disease outbreaks or monitor vaccination coverage.

These use cases highlight that a true digital record is not just about storage—it’s about enabling better healthcare outcomes.The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) has set the vision for interoperable, consent-based digital health records. However, adoption is still limited, and many providers continue to equate scanned documents with digitization.

The shift will require:

Simpler Tools for Providers: Solutions that make digital entry fast and seamless, not a burden.

Patient Awareness: Patients need to demand digital records in usable formats, not just PDFs.

Policy Push: Just as UPI standardized digital payments, India needs enforceable standards for health data exchange.

Incentives: Providers should see tangible benefits—faster claim settlements, easier compliance, or better patient retention—when they maintain true digital records.